The spokesperson said that the public facility had also shared home addresses of local adoption groups with members of the public who had visited the facility with animals who needed refuge: “I wouldn’t have known except a man came with kittens to dump them at my house,” she said.
According to the report, the city’s public health and wellness veterinarian said that the increase in diseases at the facility was because animals were being warehoused for long periods and that “longer stays for the dogs allow for more time for diseases to incubate.” It was later reported that a spokesperson for an animal adoption group in the community said that the group was being overwhelmed with requests for assistance because of the facility’s closure. Valle圜 reported that a publicly funded facility with “no-kill” policies doing business as Brownsville Animal Regulation & Care Center had announced that it would not accept “any dogs for up to six weeks” because of cases of distemper and parvovirus at the facility. Reports Showing How ‘No-Kill’ Policies Harmed Animals in June 2023 Here are some of the “no-kill” animal shelter failures that made headlines in recent years for making animals suffer a fate far worse than a kind death. The lucky ones are taken to well-run open-admission animal shelters, where they either find a well-screened, permanent home or are painlessly euthanized in the arms of professionally trained, compassionate people.
0 kommentar(er)
